PTCTemplates
FindQualifySetupRunCloseExpandTemplatesBenchmarks

close

Reduce scope, not discount

Cut seats or sites instead of discounting.

Why scope beats price

Price cuts teach buyers to wait you out. Scope cuts preserve unit economics and still let them start. Practitioner guidance from the source session prefers reducing scope over discounting.

Scope-cut example (fictional)

Same list price — thinner land.

AskBad responseBetter response
We love it but budget is tight for 30 sites30% off list for all 30Start at 1 site at full list ($X); expand to 29 after Q2 criteria
Need more seats than we budgetedHalf-price seats foreverLand 40 named seats at list; phase-two adds seats at same unit price
Can you match Vendor B price?Match and hope to upsellKeep price; cut modules not required for year-1 criteria

How to offer it

Propose a narrower rollout that still hits a subset of criteria. Keep list price intact.

FounderNexus

If the pilot worked and the PO is stuck, bring it to FounderNexus. Operators who have closed this motion will pressure-test the ask — not cheerlead.

Join FounderNexus

Claims and patterns on this page are paraphrased from practitioner session notes and the Startup Bible pilots page. See Sources.

Continue the journey