PTCFounderNexus
PlaybookIndustriesTemplatesBenchmarks

setup

Success criteria

Write three to five measurable success criteria before kickoff.

Weak versus strong success criteria for a convertible pilot.
Write three to five measurable lines into the agreement before kickoff.

Weak vs strong

Weak: the team likes it; it should save time. Strong: 80% weekly unprompted use; cycle time from four hours to under one; 500 records at target accuracy.

Warehouse / ops example (fictional)

Same workflow, two ways to write criteria.

Weak (do not use)Strong (close against this)
Team likes the new cycle-count tool≥80% of named counters complete weekly counts in-product without prompting
Should save time on the floorMedian cycle-count time from 4.0h → ≤1.0h on DC-East (baseline week 0)
More accurate inventoryVariance vs physical ≤1.5% on 500 SKU sample; finance signs the sample method
Managers are happyShift leads submit exception log <15 min/day; no critical P1 blockers open at midpoint

Proof finance can read

Direct savings beat indirect ones. You can win over ops with soft results and still lose finance.

From criteria to ROI

Turn the criteria you hit into an ROI model: labor cost, volume, and hours freed.

Write pilot success criteria

  1. Pick one workflow and one primary economic outcome.
  2. Draft 3-5 metrics with baselines and targets.
  3. Confirm you can measure each metric inside the pilot window.
  4. Get written agreement from the champion and economic buyer before kickoff.

Claims and patterns on this page are paraphrased from practitioner session notes and the Startup Bible (Pilots that convert). See Sources.

Continue the journey