Logistics pilot scorecard
Blank worksheet, EDI / WMS / TMS / ERP parallel-path checklist, filled fictional example, and AI prompt for scoring a logistics pilot toward PO or MSA.
Blank worksheet
Update weekly. Bring this to midpoint and to the commercial ask. Bound scope to one lane / one DC / one mode / one SKU family unless the agreement says otherwise.
| Criterion | Baseline | Target | Current | Status | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | [ ] G [ ] A [ ] R | ___ |
| 2. ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | [ ] G [ ] A [ ] R | ___ |
| 3. ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | [ ] G [ ] A [ ] R | ___ |
| 4. ___ (optional) | ___ | ___ | ___ | [ ] G [ ] A [ ] R | ___ |
| 5. ___ (optional) | ___ | ___ | ___ | [ ] G [ ] A [ ] R | ___ |
EDI / WMS / TMS / ERP parallel-path checklist
Start these in week one of serious interest, often before or alongside product proof instead of after "liked the dock demo." Track them as first-class workstreams beside product proof.
| Workstream | Status | Blocker | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vendor risk questionnaire | [ ] Not started [ ] In flight [ ] Cleared | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| SOC2 packet | [ ] Not started [ ] In flight [ ] Cleared | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| EDI / API to WMS | [ ] Not started [ ] In flight [ ] Cleared | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| EDI / API to TMS | [ ] Not started [ ] In flight [ ] Cleared | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| ERP hook (SAP / Oracle / etc.) | [ ] Not started [ ] In flight [ ] Cleared / N/A | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| Data room / sample feeds | [ ] Not started [ ] In flight [ ] Cleared | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| Carrier / 3PL access (if in scope) | [ ] Not started [ ] In flight [ ] Cleared / N/A | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| MSA / PO path | [ ] Not started [ ] In flight [ ] Cleared | ___ | ___ | ___ |
Working steps
Paste written success criteria into the scorecard before kickoff: OTIF / on-time delivery %, dock-to-stock hours, cost-per-shipment, dwell time, inventory accuracy, claim rate. No soft "liked the dock demo" or NPS-only lines.
If there is a separate unpaid WMS/TMS sandbox / innovation logistics-lab clock, name it. Put it on a separate sheet and keep it out of the paid pilot scorecard.
Update status every week. Treat amber without a next action as red.
Bring ops and finance / economic buyer (or clear proxies) to midpoint. Re-score against written criteria only.
Before the commercial ask, confirm EDI / WMS / TMS / ERP and vendor risk are cleared or waived in writing, and that phase-two lane / DC / mode / ACV intent is still in the agreement.
Filled example (fictional: West DC / LTL / 3 retail lanes)
Teaching example only. Pattern-check your deal; do not cite these numbers as a real case study.
| Criterion | Baseline | Target | Current (wk 7) | Status | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTIF (3 named retail lanes) | 91% | ≥96% | 96.4% | Green | Ruiz / you |
| Dock-to-stock (West DC outbound) | 6.5h | ≤4h | 3.8h | Green | DC ops |
| Cost-per-shipment (LTL cohort) | $48 | ≤$41 | $40.2 | Green | You + finance |
| Dwell time (pilot appointments) | n/a | ≤2.5h | 2.2h | Green | Yard / appointments |
| EDI + Manhattan + SOC2 | Not started | Live before ask | Live wk 6 | Green | IT / Vendor risk |
AI prompt
Paste into ChatGPT or Claude. Replace bracketed placeholders with your deal facts.
You are helping a logistics / supply-chain founder run a paid pilot that must convert to a PO or MSA with an enterprise or mid-market ops / supply-chain buyer. Company / product: [YOUR COMPANY + PRODUCT] Buyer account: [COMPANY + SEGMENT] Scope in pilot: [ONE LANE / ONE DC / ONE MODE / ONE SKU FAMILY] Pilot window: [START] to [END] Target phase-two ACV: [AMOUNT] Ops / logistics champion: [NAME / TITLE] Economic buyer: [NAME / TITLE, e.g. COO / VP Supply Chain / CFO] DC / warehouse / transportation lead: [NAME / STATUS] WMS / TMS / ERP / IT (EDI/API): [STATUS] Vendor risk / SOC2 / data room: [STATUS] Carrier / 3PL access (if needed): [STATUS] Unpaid WMS/TMS sandbox / innovation logistics lab (if any): [N/A / SEPARATE CLOCK / STATUS] Compelling event: [PEAK SEASON / CARRIER CONTRACT RENEWAL / WMS-TMS MIGRATION / DC GO-LIVE / SLA BREACH / NETWORK REDESIGN / M&A INTEGRATION / OTHER] Produce: 1) A markdown scorecard table with columns: Criterion | Baseline | Target | Current | Status (green/amber/red) | Evidence | Owner Include 3-5 underwritable criteria (OTIF / on-time delivery %, dock-to-stock hours, cost-per-shipment, dwell time, inventory accuracy, claim rate). No soft "liked the dock demo" or NPS-only lines. 2) A second table: Stakeholder | Role | Attitude | Next action this week (Roles: ops champion, EB, DC/transport, WMS/TMS/ERP/IT, vendor risk, carrier/3PL, procurement) 3) A third table for the parallel path: Workstream | Status | Blocker | Owner | Due (Include vendor risk questionnaire, SOC2 packet, EDI/API to WMS, EDI/API to TMS, ERP hook if needed, data room, carrier/3PL access if in scope, MSA/PO path) 4) End with 5 bullets: biggest risk, whether to ask for PO/MSA this week, scope-cut options (one lane / one DC / one mode / one module; hold list price and per-shipment pricing), one quick-win memo angle for EB + ops sponsor, one thing to stop doing. Rules: - Invent no fake metrics; use ___ when unknown. - Every status needs a next action. - Prefer reduce lanes / DCs / modes / modules over discounting list price or per-shipment pricing. - Ops / logistics champion is not the economic buyer. - Unpaid WMS/TMS sandbox / innovation logistics lab is not a paid customer pilot. Keep the clocks separate. - EDI, WMS/TMS/ERP, and vendor risk often start before or alongside the pilot instead of after the dock demo.
Continue the journey
- TemplatesWorking templates for buying committee, success criteria, agreement, kickoff, midpoint, stall diagnostic, and ROI.
- Logistics pilotsHow logistics and supply-chain teams convert paid pilots on a named lane, DC, mode, or SKU family into production POs and MSAs, instead of unpaid WMS/TMS sandboxes or innovation-lab co-builds.
- Success criteria builderDraft three to five measurable pilot success criteria.
- Security and procurement in parallelStart security and procurement in week one.
- Midpoint reviewHold a formal midpoint against written criteria.